WELCOME
MEMBERSHIP
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
EDUCATION
SPECIAL EVENTS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
RESOURCES
NEWSLETTER
CONTACT US


 

MCHA Happenings

September 8th Education Seminar "In the Know Panel - Part II"

November 2nd, 2010 Hospitality Recognition Lunch info & forms

July, 2010 News & Happenings

2010 Official Employee Appreciation Day
Event Results



GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
 

GA | Agenda | GA Minutes | Current Issues | Urgent Action


Government Affairs Committee E-Bulletin 

 Update January 11, 2008
Bob McKenzie, Government Affairs Director

Monterey County Hospitality Association Recommendations  on California Propositions on the February 5, 2008 Ballot. The Monterey County Hospitality Association has studied the seven propositions that appear on the February 5, 2008 Presidential Primary ballot and makes these vote recommendations:

Proposition 91 - Vote NO

The sponsors of this measure ask for a No vote.  The problems the sponsors sought to solve, a correction of language weaknesses in Proposition 42 mandating that sales taxes on motor vehicle fuels be devoted to transportation projects, were fixed when voters approved Proposition 1A last year.  When the voters approved 1A, it was too late to stop the process of getting Proposition 91 on the ballot.

 

Proposition 92 - Vote NO

This measure would amend state law and the California Constitution to change the method of governance for community colleges and lock-in the amount of the state budget that is devoted to community college funding much like Proposition 98 did for K-12 school funding.  MCHA agrees that community colleges should receive adequate funding to perform their missions but does not believe a fixed formula is the proper way to accomplish this.

 

Proposition 93 - Vote NO

This measure would alter California’s voter-approved term limits law which mandates an individual can serve a maximum of six years in the State Assembly and a maximum of eight years in the State Senate.  If passed an individual could serve a maximum of 12 years in the legislature but all 12 years could be served in the same house of the legislature.  MCHA does not think this would provide any benefit to California and would partially defeat the purpose of term limits.

 

Propositions 94, 95, 96 and 97 - MCHA takes no position.
These propositions are all referenda on Indian Gaming Compact changes approved by the legislature and signed by the Governor.  The changes allow tribes with existing casinos to increase the number of slot machines allowed in return for paying the state certain revenues.  These propositions ask the voter to ratify the changes (a Yes vote) or defeat them (a No vote).  MCHA does not believe this is a hospitality industry issue and takes no position on these propositions.

 


©2009 MCHA • P.O. Box 223542 • Carmel, California 93922 • Phone 831-626-8636 • Fax 831-626-4269 • info@mcha.net